"Can I leave my blog to AI?"

Limitations of AI and Blogging


"Isn't blogging already completely entrusted to AI?"

With such expectations in mind,
From "composition, writing, SEO design, and OGP images", I threw everything to AI.

Indeed, the result is...
** "It's too convenient", but "I still need a human". **

In this article,
Based on my experience of actually creating blog posts with AI,

  • What can I do?
  • Where to stumble
  • How far is the right answer to delegate?

I will tell you my real realization.


List of things I've done with AI

  • Article Title Generation
     → ChatGPT to use. A catchier idea comes out than I imagined.

  • Creation of a Proposed Structure
     → ChatGPT to use. The flow of the introduction and headline is very natural.

  • Writing this article
     → Instructions to ChatGPT, including elements of testimonials. It's pretty good as a draft material.

  • SEO Measures
     → While creating a foundation with ChatGPT, human fine-tuning is essential. AI alone is a bit sweet.

  • OGP Image Generation
     → DALL· Euse. You can easily create horizontal images that meet the Discover publication standards.


What surprised me about the greatness of AI

1. It gives you a composition from scratch

Just tell them the keyword,
It is really helpful to organize the "introduction", "heading structure", and "summary".

If you want to use an analogy,
The feeling of "just fleshing out with the skeleton already standing".

2. The writing style is flexible and human-like

If you adjust it a little, you can make it into a "natural Japanese" sentence.

You can also adjust the tone of rough narration and polite language.
It's easy to adjust to your readership.


Where AI fell short

1. "My own experience" can only be written by myself.

Real empathy and ** "messing"**, which are essential for experience-based articles, are "kind of lies" when AI tries to write.

→ Just adding my own actual experience briefly gave the article a different sense of trust.

2. I can't reach the "itch" of SEO

For example...

  • Use heading tags appropriately
  • Natural insertion of co-occurring words
  • Composition and placement of images for Discover

These will be chig hugs if left to AI.
In the end, it was necessary to adjust with "human eyes and senses".


What is the strongest share between AI and humans?

The conclusion I came to is...

**"Design" and "Draft" are AI,
"Empathy" and "finishing" are for humans. **

For example:

  • ❯ Generate ideas → Let AI make suggestions
  • ❯ Article structure → Let AI create it
  • ❯ Experiences + Summary → Write by yourself
  • ❯ SEO & tag adjustment → Check yourself

In this way,
I realized that I can spend half the time and not lose quality.


Conclusion AI is a "companion", not a "stand-in"

AI is the training wheel of thought and the drafting machine of sentences.
But that alone does not make it a "read article".

In particular, "experiences that only you can write" and "empathy with readers"
No matter how far you go, it is a charm that only humans can show.

That's why I felt once again that AI should be used as a partner to unlock the value within oneself.