日本語

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs ChatGPT 5.2 (GPT-5.2): Which AI Is Better for Reasoning, Writing, and Coding in 2026?

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs ChatGPT 5.2 comparison

Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and ChatGPT 5.2 (GPT-5.2) are positioned as high-performance AI models for reasoning, writing, and coding. But once you start paying for tools and integrating them into daily work, the real question becomes practical: which one should you use, and for what?

This guide compares Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.2 using official primary sources (release blogs, model pages, changelogs, and pricing pages). The focus is simple: help you choose the right model for reasoning tasks, long-form content, software development, and blog production.


Scope and Assumptions

Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • Announced on the official Google blog on February 19, 2026
  • Lists ARC-AGI-2 verified 77.1%
  • Provided in the Gemini API as Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

ChatGPT 5.2 (GPT-5.2)

  • Published on the official OpenAI blog on December 11, 2025
  • Lists SWE-Bench Pro 55.6% (Verified 80%)
  • States knowledge cutoff: August 2025 in official release notes

Reasoning Performance Comparison

Where Gemini 3.1 Pro stands out

  • Strong emphasis on benchmark gains in reasoning
  • ARC-AGI-2 score is highlighted clearly
  • Positioned as a stronger baseline for complex tasks

Practical upside

  • Good fit for users who prioritize benchmark-backed reasoning improvements
  • Strong integration path with Google tooling such as CLI and Android Studio workflows

Caution

  • The model is presented as a Preview, so output consistency may vary by use case

Where GPT-5.2 stands out

  • Emphasizes practical performance, especially coding-oriented evaluation
  • SWE-Bench Pro metrics are clearly stated
  • Highlights improvements in long-form reasoning and factual reliability

Practical upside

  • Better for teams that value operational stability and clear API behavior
  • Easier to standardize in production workflows due to explicit model controls

Caution

  • Official guidance still recommends verification for critical decisions

Long-Form Writing and Blog Workflow

Gemini 3.1 Pro for research-heavy drafting

  • Strong connection to Gemini apps, NotebookLM, and Deep Research workflows
  • Effective for: gathering sources, organizing ideas, and creating first drafts

Best use

  • Early-stage blog production where research breadth matters most

Limitation

  • As a preview model, draft quality can fluctuate in edge cases

GPT-5.2 for editing and final quality

  • Designed for long-document integration
  • Supports high-context processing (up to 400,000 tokens)
  • Knowledge cutoff is explicitly stated (August 2025)

Best use

  • Mid-to-late stage writing: structure cleanup, argument consistency, and final polish

Limitation

  • Still requires factual checks for high-stakes claims

Coding and Development Workflow

Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • Gemini CLI
  • Android Studio integration
  • Google Antigravity
  • Vertex AI pathways

Strength

  • Strong ecosystem fit for teams already working inside Google-centered development stacks

GPT-5.2

  • Clear API specifications
  • reasoning.effort control
  • Publicly stated SWE-Bench Pro evaluation

Strength

  • Practical for code assistance where predictability and API clarity are priorities

Pricing Snapshot (Official Sources)

Gemini

  • Google AI Pro: 2,900 JPY/month (with a 1-month free period)
  • Google AI Ultra: 36,400 JPY/month (discount periods may apply)

ChatGPT

  • Free / Go / Plus / Pro / Business / Enterprise tiers
  • GPT-5.2 is available on plans such as Plus (availability may vary)
  • Final pricing can change depending on region, campaign, and display conditions

Always confirm final prices on official pages before purchase.


Which One Should You Choose?

If your priority is blogging

  • Research-first workflow -> Gemini 3.1 Pro
  • Long-form editing and final draft quality -> GPT-5.2

If your priority is software development

  • IDE/CLI integration in Google ecosystem -> Gemini 3.1 Pro
  • API clarity and practical coding stability -> GPT-5.2

Final Recommendation

Gemini 3.1 Pro is strong for benchmark-oriented reasoning progress and Google ecosystem integration. GPT-5.2 is strong for practical stability, long-form consolidation, and production-friendly coding support.

For many teams, the most reliable workflow is:

1. Research with Gemini 3.1 Pro
2. Structure, edit, and finalize with GPT-5.2

This role split reduces overlap, improves reproducibility, and usually leads to better output quality across both writing and development tasks.

Related posts